GPL is intellectual property that proprietary companies steal

GPL is intellectual property that proprietary companies steal

Post by 7 » Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:39:29



Troll!!!

Look in the mirror fool.
You are looking at a COLA faker and asstroturfing troll.

You have nothing to talk about in terms of Linux except troll.
 
 
 

1. [News] GPL Networking Software Beats Proprietary; Invoices Made Easy in Linux (Also GPL)

2. MS fud latest: likely issues of OSS contributors and your companies intellectual property ..

"The Open Source "Community" development model involves potentially
large numbers of developers who are subject to little if any legal
oversight and .. the typical Community contributor has a day job at a
technology company and is likely to have signed a broad employment
agreement with his employer vesting ownership of intellectual property
(including possibly the contributions made to the OSS project) with the
employer"

http:// *** .law.harvard.edu/foi/images/3/3f/OSS_Issues_in_Acquisitions_and_Inbound_Transactions_01-05-07.pdf

3. [News] FOSS Player Complains About Intellectual Monopolies Favouring Proprietary Software

4. [News] Intellectual Monopolies Infect Education System, AP 'Steals' Stories

5. [News] Hypocritical Intellectual Monopolies Like CNN Are 'Stealing'

6. [News] Intellectual Monopolies Shamed: MAFIAA Boss Shows How to 'Steal' Files

7. [News] StarPlay Fights Proprietary Licensing with the GNU GPL

8. need proprietary alternative to GPL-licensed functions in linux/drivers/base/class.c

9. [News] GPL-Licensed Virtualisation a Challenge to Proprietary VMWare

10. [News] Sun Regrets Staying Proprietary, Microsoft Steal Sun's Idea

11. [News] GPL-licensed Hypervisor Bites VMWare's Proprietary One

12. GPL-ed code in a driver for a proprietary OS

13. Mixing GPL and proprietary code for hosted solution

14. Read the facts about MySQL and GPL - no risk to use with proprietary apps

15. [News] Proprietary Games Can't Help Using High-quality GPL-licensed Code