[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Roy Schest » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:20:48


Fedora v. Ubuntu: A Performance Look

,----[ Quote ]
| In this article we have enclosed benchmarks from Fedora Core 6,
| Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft, Fedora 7 Test 2, and Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Herd
| 5. In *** and desktop benchmarks, which of these Linux
| distributions is faster? We hope to answer that question today.
`----

http://www.yqcomputer.com/

Windows vs. Unix, part duh!

,----[ Quote ]
| When do three easy pieces lead to a conclusion about risks of
| unusual size? When they're about mis-adventures with Windows software.
`----

http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by yttr » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:32:04


What a stupid *** ing comparison. The performance differential
between the linuces they tested are well within absolutely standard
error allowance---which means that they mean exactly nothing at all.

In layman's terms---they tested the same operating system four
times. Real brainiacs there.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yqcomputer.com/

 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Bunifa Lat » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:02:20


http://www.yqcomputer.com/

What's wrong with this picture ?
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Roy Schest » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:48:20

__/ [ yttrx ] on Thursday 08 March 2007 05:32 \__



Yes. See my comment here:

http://www.yqcomputer.com/

This isn't the first benchmark of his which I criticise. I advised him to do
a Solaris versus Linux comparison. He received the Solaris developers kit a
couple of days ago, so it should be interesting.

--
~~ Best wishes

A computer is like air conditioning: it becomes useless when you open
windows.
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Hadron Qua » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:36:09


XXXX@XXXXX.COM (yttrx) writes:



The mind boggles. These guys really are nuts.
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by yttr » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:17:15


Though that would be interesting, it's pretty well established that while
solaris is *generally* more robust and stable than most linux distributions,
it is also substantially slower.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Roy Schest » Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:24:11

__/ [ yttrx ] on Thursday 08 March 2007 12:17 \__




JVM, Looking Glass... I heard that it takes a beast to just run Looking Glass
smoothly under Linux (they have Ubuntu binaries). But it's a wealthy company
with customers who are willing to pay more than they need to (e.g. with
Linux). I guess your NY employer is one of those top-tier outfits with
cuff-linked exec who think that more expensive necessarily mean better. And
good supports equates to a shiny bruchure that smells nice...

--
~~ Best wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Windows: slippery when dry. You have been warned.
http://www.yqcomputer.com/ | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
1:20pm up 44 days 13:38, 7 users, load average: 1.29, 1.32, 1.26
http://www.yqcomputer.com/ - Open Source knowledge engine project
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by yttr » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:18:51


What the *** are you talking about? Do you actually have any meaningful
solaris experience? No? Then shut the *** up and learn about it before
you type. Every *** ing systems engineer on the planet knows that Solaris
is more stable under heavy load of all types than Linux is, period. Also,
every *** ing systems engineer on the planet knows that Solaris is a hell
of a lot slower than linux is.

And, looking glass? I'm talking about actual applications here, shit *** .
Not your *** ing pr0n browsing on your stupid *** ing desktop.

And, I am my own employer, asshat.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Roy Schest » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:45:33

_/ [ yttrx ] on Thursday 08 March 2007 15:18 \__


Here. Have some tea, darling.

--
~~ Best wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | You can never get nine women to deliver a baby in a
month
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 5 Mar 8 15:53 last=S
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by yttr » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:08:55

oy Schestowitz < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote:

Take your risperdal, sweetie.




-----yttrx



--
http://www.yttrx.net

 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by B Gruf » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:26:23


Ohmygod! They are quoting from Black Adder Goes Forth now!
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by The Ghost » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:51:16

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, yttrx
< XXXX@XXXXX.COM >
wrote
on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:08:55 GMT
<HqXHh.5484$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM >:


[snippage]


Get a room, dears. :-)


--
#191, XXXX@XXXXX.COM
Been there, done that, didn't get the T-shirt.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Mark Ken » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 06:17:33

B Gruff < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > espoused:


Bob: "I'd do anything for the troops, Sir"
Cpn BA: "I wouldn't let them know that if I were you..."

--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.yqcomputer.com/ |
| Cola trolls: http://www.yqcomputer.com/ |
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by yttr » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:07:27


Ah, the subtle complexity of southern racist redneck humor.




-----yttrx


--
http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

[News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

Post by Linonu » Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:40:31

After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o' wisdom:


I'd have offered him a teabag, instead.

--
"When we do a new version we put in lots of new things that people (ask) for.
And so, in no sense, is stability a reason to move to a new version. It's
never a reason." -- Bill Gates, FOCUS interview
http://www.yqcomputer.com/