[News] US Government Indifferent to Intellectual Monopoly Abuse

[News] US Government Indifferent to Intellectual Monopoly Abuse

Post by Roy Schest » Wed, 14 May 2008 23:18:59


----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patent Reform Act stalls in the Senate

,----[ Quote ]
| After years of heated debate and lobbying, the Patent Reform Act of 2007,
| which passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and was scheduled for a
| Senate vote this session, has been taken off the Senate's calendar. It can be
| revived, but its momentum has effectively fizzled.
|
| Apparently, the Senate has better things to do with its time.
`----

http://www.cnet.com/8301-13555_1-9941241-34.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

Let's bet that the Microsoft appeal to the ECJ is about patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft is appealing the decision of the European Commission over the 900M
| EUR fine. Microsoft is not happy about the patent licensing terms that the
| Commission has negotiated, and want to tax open source projects, such Samba
| and Redhat:
|
| Microsoft argues that the licensing terms demanded by the EC violate its
| intellectual property rights.
|
| Let's bet that the Microsoft appeal to the ECJ is about patents. My nose is
| rarely wrong.
`----

http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-59250/let-s-bet-that-the-microsoft-appeal-to-the-ecj-is-about-patents
http://tinyurl.com/5npfpb


Related:

Why Microsoft Was Wrong

,----[ Quote ]
| There cannot be many businesspeople who doubt that a monopolist can use its
| market power to squash even the most efficient rival producers of goods or
| services that interact with the monopolized product. There cannot be many
| venture capitalists who would invest in a company whose market can at any
| moment fall under the sway of an entrenched neighboring monopolist whose
| behavior was subject to no limits.
|
| What I will do is continue to look hard at the actions of monopolists. I will
| use my practical business experience to help me understand the dynamics of
| markets. I will look for answers that maintain the incentives of everyone on
| the market to innovate, and not just the friendly neighborhood monopolist.
| Power has to be used responsibly, by the enforcement agencies and by the
| monopolists. I will not look for fights, but where interventions will make
| consumers better off, I will not shy away from them.
`----

http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/kroes/antitrust_eu_us.pdf


Microsoft, antitrust and innovation, by Georg Greve

,----[ Quote ]
| 1st Fallacy: That the Ruling Punishes Innovation
|
| [...]
|
| 2nd Fallacy: That Google, Apple and All Successful Companies Need to Fear
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070923170905803


Microsoft Hard-Balling EU Over Vista

,----[ Quote ]
| "This is part of the negotiating strategy," a person familiar with the
| situation told internetnews.com. "They're in a public relations battle."
|
| Microsoft made the same threat to South Korean regulators, but did not
| follow through when they lost that battle.
`----

http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3631041


EU reportedly threatening new Microsoft fines

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft could face a fine of up to $3.85 million a day it if
| failed to comply, it added. Kroes told the Guardian that she was
| growing tired of waiting for Microsoft to meet her demands.
`----

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6135710.html


Microsoft sets spinners on court verdict

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft may have lost in c
 
 
 

[News] US Government Indifferent to Intellectual Monopoly Abuse

Post by Phil Da Li » Wed, 14 May 2008 23:41:45


Let's hope that the more sensible commisioners use this as a cast iron
demonstration that the pro-cii lobby ARE in fact in favour of pure
software patent regime.