editor flameware, was:: [OT] Not - Searching program to swith to console from X

editor flameware, was:: [OT] Not - Searching program to swith to console from X

Post by Alan Conno » Thu, 18 Sep 2003 04:09:14



Some truth in that.

But vi IS an amazing editor which a lot of people don't give a chance.

I've tried a dozen and wouldn't even consider using anything else.



AC

--

take control of your mailbox ----- elrav1 ----- http://www.yqcomputer.com/
spammers hate this program because they can't beat it
 
 
 

editor flameware, was:: [OT] Not - Searching program to swith to console from X

Post by Michael Po » Thu, 18 Sep 2003 05:26:24

>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Connor < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > writes:

Alan> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:28:40 GMT, mjt


>>> And why do more people in the Linux/UNIX world use vi (and its
>>> derivatives - I'm using elvis-tiny here) than any other editor
>> ... most of it is because it is found on every *nix right out
>> of the box for eons. if you wanted a non-command-line oriented
>> editor (such as ed), you only really had vi.

>> editors, like opinions, are a personal thing. you like vi, i
>> think slickedit blows all editors in the dust, the next person
>> will think emacs or joe or jed is the best editor. . -- ///

Alan> Some truth in that.

Alan> But vi IS an amazing editor which a lot of people don't give
Alan> a chance.

Alan> I've tried a dozen and wouldn't even consider using anything
Alan> else.

well, every linux/unix user should know the basics of editing with vi,
because it _is_ often what's available. but, i'll never give up my
emacs! ;-) a complete IDE, AND i can read news in it, too. `C-x b
RET' and it looks like i'm working! whoo-hoo!

mp

--
cat: /home/powem/.signature: No such file or directory