Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by SINNE » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 03:49:28


* Rob R. Ainscough wrote in microsoft.public.xbox:


And you're the fool that needed to quote all 1600+ lines just to show us
your infinte wisdom?

--
David
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by Rob R. Ain » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 04:59:55

1600+ lines - so you counted them - now that is wise...oh brother, is that
the best you can do for a come back?

 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by SINNE » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 05:09:44

* Rob R. Ainscough wrote in microsoft.public.xbox:


No I didnt count them *** head, your newsserver did and proivded the header
called LINES: WHich any REAL news client displays for the user.

A comeback? I didnt need a comeback until now (see above) Learn a little
about the real world before you comment on what you can see through your
broken newsreader.

--
David
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by Rob R. Ain » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 05:42:23

and the relevance is?? This is a thread that should be deleted as it really
has nothing to do with anything XBOX. And why you responded with a line
count and some pathetic retort about using quotes is even more baffling.
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by SINNE » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 05:49:57

* Rob R. Ainscough wrote in microsoft.public.xbox:


So why did you respond initially?


No, what is baffeling and pathetic is that you responded to a post that my
server deleted as did most decent servers proabably. It is your fault the
spam propogated and your full quote made sure people that would not have
seen it, did.

--
David
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by Doug Jacob » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 06:18:37


You tell me. YOU'RE the one who responded to the original article.


Actually, the original article doesn't show up on my server at all. It
must have been marked as spam and deleted.

However, your server obviously didn't delete the original article, AND you
felt it necessary to quote the whole *** y thing just so you could put in
your worthless $.02 to a thread you knew was off-topic.
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by Rob R. Ain » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 06:19:24

That's a good one, I originally responded to a deleted message -- what
science is this? If this message were deleted as you indicated my
newsreader would have indicated such, so either you didn't delete it or your
deletion process is painfully slow.

I responded to the content of the original spam so that others would see
that the spam is not a good thing. Because the reality is spam sells and
that's why spam still exists. So if some kid (lets be real, XBOX does
attract the younger more impressionable audience) does read it and/or
follows the links, they would have some perspective that what they're
reading is propaganda.

If you had your act together, this spam would not have even made it to the
newsgroup to be viewed by anyone. Baffle me another one.
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by SINNE » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:31:23

* Rob R. Ainscough wrote in microsoft.public.xbox:

Your reading comprehension skills are sorely lacking and I would bet
your knowledge of Usenet the same. YOUR server had the message, mine did
not. Neither of your above assumptions are remotely relevant to the
issue at hand.



Which was your first mistake.


First if all, Bullshit, you were trying nothing of the sort. Your
response indicated nothing to ward off 'kids'.

If that is really what you wanted to do you should have changed the
subject to:

[SPAM] (was :Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ)

And then you should have deleted the whole body and replaced it with:

Abuse message sent to: XXXX@XXXXX.COM

And quoted the abuse email from the headers.

Please note even Google does not have a copy of the message. You alone
are responsible for its propagation and have become a spammer by proxy
since most other news servers deleted and did not propagate the message.


*snicker*

Nobody saw it in any of my messages but you fully quoted it! What
baffles me is that you STILL don't get it.

--
David
You could get a new lease on life -- if only you didn't need the first
and last month in advance.
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by Rob R. Ain » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 11:00:40

Sorry for the Delay, I had some real software engineering problems to
resolve not admin stuff.

David, get back to me when you really figure out what is going on
here...."google"... that's classic!

BTW, calling someone a "dickhead" really does NOT help your credibility.
 
 
 

Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ - New Game - Battle Plan of Christ

Post by SINNE » Sat, 08 Apr 2006 12:46:40

* Rob R. Ainscough wrote in microsoft.public.xbox:

Yeah, I am sure they were tough like password resets.


This from a top posting non snipping twit.

Thing is, I do understand and have tried to explain it to you multiple
times. The problem is that you don't know anything about Usenet. I could
go on with technical details but its unlikely you'd get it or even read
it, since it is evident you have not thus far.


Generally something I never depend on, just something I stumbled on as I
was composing my post. I wanted to give you the exact header from the
original post, but as I mentioned (that part you continually dismiss)
the post isn't on mine or many other servers, so as a last resort, I
googled it, and to my shock, it wasn't there either. All this further
proves my point and your continuous denial makes your stupidity much
more apparent.


I don't need any credibility with you. The facts are there if you care to
see them. Admitting you are wrong is the first step to recovery.

--
David
"Humor is a drug which it's the fashion to abuse."
-- William Gilbert