Hi Mike, thanks for the reply.
It's been thought that I might try putting the server2003 on instead of
using XP pro because the server OS is built to handle multiple processors.
When that was mentioned, I thought XP also would handle multiple processors,
and thus the task manager showing 4 processors was proof enough.
Do you think tacking the server OS on instead of XP would make a difference,
or do you really think that 4 MB stream at 320X240 resolution is truly too
much of a bottleneck for a T.O.T.L. system. Everything is pretty much the
latest in this box.