not about: Security update 2004-12-02

not about: Security update 2004-12-02

Post by Davi » Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:00:53


On 2004-12-05 14:19:18 -0500, "Bev A. Kupf" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > said:


Then why couldn't you all change the subject so other folks would know
the discussion had nothing to do with the subject? Shouldn't take too
much time from yor regular third-grade school girl snits.
 
 
 

not about: Security update 2004-12-02

Post by Bev A. Kup » Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:02:45

On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:00:53 -0500,


Or you could use a newsreader that kills a sub-thread. Why should
I take the time to do anything, when the technology for you to not
read my posts exists?

--
Many a smale maketh a grate -- Geoffrey Chaucer

 
 
 

not about: Security update 2004-12-02

Post by Davi » Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:14:53

On 2004-12-05 15:02:45 -0500, "Bev A. Kupf" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > said:


Yep, thanks for the reminder, I will. I've realized that posts from
most of the participants in this thread can all be killfiled with
little risk of missing anything other than personal snits.
 
 
 

not about: Security update 2004-12-02

Post by Davi » Fri, 10 Dec 2004 02:35:59

On 2004-12-07 18:39:59 -0500, XXXX@XXXXX.COM (Mike Rosenberg) said:


Problem with that is you miss on topic replies to the thread. Folks
that can't control themselvs enough to stop personal bickering don't
limit themselves to one thread.
 
 
 

not about: Security update 2004-12-02

Post by mike » Fri, 10 Dec 2004 06:43:29


Killfiling by subthread would handle that. You still get other branches
of the thread while missing the branch that's now off-topic.

--
Mike Rosenberg
< http://www.yqcomputer.com/ > Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida
< http://www.yqcomputer.com/ > Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
Toyota Prius fans: Check out alt.autos.toyota.prius