Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by PHiLi » Tue, 01 Nov 2005 13:53:56


Do I need to keep version 1.1 if I have the new 2.0 installed?

Setup doesn't look like it has uninstalled the old one, which suggests
2.0 is not a direct replacement. Am I correct?
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by CT » Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:36:51

You're correct; apps built for the .NET Framework 1.1 will continue to run
in the context of 1.1, and apps built for 2.0....

--
Carsten Thomsen
Communities - http://www.yqcomputer.com/

 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by Olaf Baeye » Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:31:37

> You're correct; apps built for the .NET Framework 1.1 will continue to run
Doesn't have v2.0 have backward functionality to run v1.1 even if the v1.1
is not installed?
I don't think that you need v1.1 anymore if you have v2.0 installed.

Last time I testested v1.0 programs and they ran fine under v1.1 only
installs.
So I guess that this wil be the case too for v2.0

What I do imagine is that some functionality might break in the v2.0
version, in this case installing the v1.1 might be a solution, but if you
stick to the v1.1 specification and did not use *** functionality, then I
believe that it just runs fine under v2.0.
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by CT » Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:12:31

Nope, no backward compatibility mode, I'm afraid.

--
Carsten Thomsen
Communities - http://www.yqcomputer.com/
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by Jay B. Har » Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:08:56

Carsten,
| Nope, no backward compatibility mode, I'm afraid.
What do you mean?

Most .NET 1.0 & 1.1 applications will run on .NET 2.0.

http://www.yqcomputer.com/

In fact most .NET 1.0 & 1.1 apps will run under the .NET 2.0 64-bit edition!

http://www.yqcomputer.com/

However due to the change in the meta data, no .NET 2.0 app will run on .NET
1.0 or 1.1.

Of course can install .NET 1.0, 1.1 & 2.0 side-by-side & have all three
versions installed.

--
Hope this helps
Jay [MVP - Outlook]
.NET Application Architect, Enthusiast, & Evangelist
T.S. Bradley - http://www.yqcomputer.com/




| Nope, no backward compatibility mode, I'm afraid.
|
| --
| Carsten Thomsen
| Communities - http://www.yqcomputer.com/
|


| >> You're correct; apps built for the .NET Framework 1.1 will continue to
| >> run
| >> in the context of 1.1, and apps built for 2.0....
| >>
| > Doesn't have v2.0 have backward functionality to run v1.1 even if the
v1.1
| > is not installed?
| > I don't think that you need v1.1 anymore if you have v2.0 installed.
| >
| > Last time I testested v1.0 programs and they ran fine under v1.1 only
| > installs.
| > So I guess that this wil be the case too for v2.0
| >
| > What I do imagine is that some functionality might break in the v2.0
| > version, in this case installing the v1.1 might be a solution, but if
you
| > stick to the v1.1 specification and did not use *** functionality,
then
| > I
| > believe that it just runs fine under v2.0.
| >
| >
|
|
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by CT » Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:32:47

Jay,

Inline please.

--
Carsten Thomsen
Communities - http://www.yqcomputer.com/

"Jay B. Harlow [MVP - Outlook]" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM > wrote in


Yes, I have seriously misinterpreted the information presented to me. I do
apologize :-$
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by Olaf Baeye » Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:04:50

> > Carsten,
That means that you are human. :-)
I also made a big mistake about the security rights in .NET recently.

Life is a learning process. ;-)
 
 
 

Do I need .Net Framework 1.1 Redistributable after 2.0?

Post by CT » Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:46:51

> Life is a learning process. ;-)
Now that is so true. Thanks for understanding. :-)

--
Carsten Thomsen
Communities - http://www.yqcomputer.com/