QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Andrew Wa » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:31:26


How different is it to program C# for Visual Studio 2003.NET & Visual Studio
2005? I know Visual Studio 2003.NET uses .NET 1.1, whilst VS2005 uses .NET
2.0. So the question really is, what is the difference & significance of
programming C# for .NET 1.1 & .NET 2.0?
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Dugg » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:41:16

http://www.yqcomputer.com/

Thanks
-Cnu

 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Michael Ne » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:44:21

Hello Andrew,

http://www.yqcomputer.com/ (VS.80).aspx

---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://www.yqcomputer.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

AW> How different is it to program C# for Visual Studio 2003.NET &
AW> Visual Studio 2005? I know Visual Studio 2003.NET uses .NET 1.1,
AW> whilst VS2005 uses .NET 2.0. So the question really is, what is the
AW> difference & significance of programming C# for .NET 1.1 & .NET 2.0?
AW>
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Andrew Wa » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:48:49

Thanks.

My question really was, if one programmed C# for VS2003 (.NET1.1), will it
easily migrate to VS2005 (.NET2.0)?
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Michael Ne » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:55:16

Hello Andrew,

It depends on type of app. If only C# without many dependencies on .NET fw
like appdomains and etc - he will.
The worst case is ASP.net - many changes need to be done

---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://www.yqcomputer.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

AW> Thanks.
AW>
AW> My question really was, if one programmed C# for VS2003 (.NET1.1),
AW> will it easily migrate to VS2005 (.NET2.0)?
AW>


AW>
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Andrew Wa » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:04:39

.NET fw? appdomains?
So it's like programming VS6 + MFC6. As long as I keep away from using
MFC6/.NET1.1 specific stuff then code will work in future versions of VS.
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Michael Ne » Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:14:30

Hello Andrew,

Not so, but very close.
Just C# has the best compartability. Another .NET framework features was
changed more

---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://www.yqcomputer.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo

AW> .NET fw? appdomains?
AW> So it's like programming VS6 + MFC6. As long as I keep away from
AW> using
AW> MFC6/.NET1.1 specific stuff then code will work in future versions
AW> of VS.


AW>
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by .NET/ C# » Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:13:06

Hi,



| Thanks.
|
| My question really was, if one programmed C# for VS2003 (.NET1.1), will it
| easily migrate to VS2005 (.NET2.0)?
|

Ar eyou talking about migrating code or your knowledge?

Code should be easily migrated, from 1.1 to 2.0. IIRC all the
classes/methods from 1.1 are present in 2.0 only that some are marked as
"absolete" and will report as warning.

If you give more details of what you need to migrate more detalied info can
be provided.


--
Ignacio Machin
machin AT laceupsolutions com
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Cor Ligthe » Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:28:02

Michael,

I am curious, what do you mean with this *best*,

Cor
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Cor Ligthe » Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:28:59

Oh,

Too explain I have another expirience.

Cor
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Michael Ne » Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:33:34

Hello Cor Ligthert [MVP],

having writing the "best" I meant that pure C# issues are easier to be fixed
in .net 2.0 rather then such thing as porting asp.net 1.1 to 2.0

C> Michael,
C>
C> I am curious, what do you mean with this *best*,
C>
C> Cor
C>
---
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [C# MVP] :: blog: http://www.yqcomputer.com/

"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
 
 
 

QUERY: C# woes .NET 1.1 vs .NET 2.0

Post by Arne Vaj » Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:20:09


It is intended to be an easy upgrade.

Very likely it will be easy.

The stuff you did in 2003 you can also do in 2005.

You can learn the new features gradually.

There are some things that are changed in the way VS and .NET
do it, but my guess is that 5 minutes of googling can resolve
most of the problems.

I would say: GO.

Arne